Haisch rejects intelligent design and fully embraces evolution. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Like Haisch, I utterly reject Intelligent Design. Ultimately, your individual consciousness will be fully reunited with the infinite consciousness of God; this can be characterized as heaven. We influence their formations by the waves we personally create and, at times, actually demonstrate to ourselves the personal influence of sentient beings on material events the experimenter effect.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Aside from these things, the actual theor of the book is interesting. Our experience is his experience because ultimately we are him, that is, immortal spiritual beings, offspring of God, temporarily living in the realm of matter. Indeed, it hernard to me that there is better empirical evidence for the existence of God than there is for the many dimensions of string theory.
Jul 22, Keely rated it liked it Shelves: I will try to add comments as my reading progresses. I would like, please, every scientist, to give consideration to how much better off we would be, individually and collectively, if the God Theory could become, once again, just as it was for Newton, the working hypothesis of modern science.
Far be it for me to say his conclusions are wrong, but a lot of this did not resonate with me. No wonder religion is winning! Bernqrd exists in each of us His words and creativity are certainly welcomed by me!
Both views are equally logical and beyond proof. However exceptional human experiences and accounts of mystics throughout the ages do suggest that we live in a purposeful universe. Advances are made by answering questions. Discoveries are made by questioning answers. Bernard Haisch, Ph. After earning his Ph. Meinrad Seminary as a student for the Catholic priesthood. Larry Dossey, author of Space, Time and Medicine Whether one will agree or disagree, powerful arguments are presented for one to consider.
Is there an intelligence behind the origin of the Universe? To some degree Haisch falls into this trap, particularly in mentioning more than once the Fred Hoyle prediction of a key nuclear level in carbon through noting his own existence. If the level were not there, there could be little carbon, hence no Hoyle.
Ergo, the level exists. David Gross rightly points out that quantum chromodynamics is fixed, complete, and not tunable, and it just so happens that the level is there, Hoyle or no Hoyle. But that kind of argument is not the essence of Haisch's case for God. Let me quote a single sentence from his book, which I have chosen because it so perfectly encapsulates my own understanding: "It is not matter that creates an illusion of consciousness, but consciousness that creates an illusion of matter.
And yet in how many physics classes today are students made aware of this most fundamental discovery? In all of my classes, I assure you; but I am confident that this is not common. The illusion of matter, which is to say the illusion of a really-existing world, is so strong, that I think most scientists are unable to overcome it. And how, out of this, does God appear? Well, the only mind I know exists is my own.
My choice is solipsism or God. Haisch, too, says his is "a theory that looks promising, not scientific proof. Haisch's early history is that of a Catholic seminarian; mine, that of a child raised in wishy-washy Protestantism, but never taking it seriously. And as for me, I am now a theist. All the difference in the universe! So what is the practical effect? Take evolution.
0コメント